GLOBAL BLOCKCHAIN WKN: A2PFYA ISIN: CA37959M2031 Kürzel: BLKCF Forum: Fonds Thema: Hauptdiskussion

Warum der Grund für den Anstieg?

Hauptsache es fällt nicht mehr

Da geht noch was heute noch auf 0.15 das wäre super

Hoch bis 2euro wenn schon denn schon

Kann das jemand mal übersetzen wofür der Grund für den Anstieg ist

Was ist denn bitte passiert?

Wow. Es steigt.

https://www.cbsnews.com/cbsn-originals/

Mensch Einsteiger wo bist du!:-) Hast immer gute Infos und verbreitest ausserdem positive Stimmung !

Schöner anstieg

Bald startet der Token Verkauf für die eigene Kryptowährung, gibt immer mehr Berichte in den Medien über das Projekt: https://blokt.com/news/op-ed-multi-token-connectivity-is-the-next-step-for-global-blockchain-adoption Op-ed: Multi-Token Connectivity Is The Next Step for Global Blockchain Adoption How do 1,800 different cryptocurrencies interact with each other? An interoperable framework is essential for cryptocurrencies to be able to transact together and transfer value in a way that isn’t limited to addresses on the same chain, Laser Protocol CEO Shidan Gouran explains. Thanks at least in part to Bitcoin’s incredibly bullish trend over the past 12+ months, cryptocurrencies are experiencing daily discussion within the public. With companies as large as Goldman Sachs and MasterCard opening blockchain divisions, it’s no secret that distributed ledger technology has massive application potential. Though before these many applications can be deployed to a fully-adopted consumer base, the blockchain community must solve a singularly vital issue; the segmentation of different chains and their corresponding economic ecosystems. With so many blockchains and no easy way for them to interoperate with one another, we built Laser to enable that interoperability and federate the many blockchains that operate today. How Did We Trade Gold, Silver & Bronze? Advertisement Consider the following analogy to help to understand the issue. Imagine two villages. One uses silver tokens within their village. The other uses gold coins. Unfortunately for them, they have both just been conquered by a warrior king. The kingdom to which these two villages now belong trades exclusively in bronze. Everything produced within the territory can only be purchased with bronze. So, how exactly are citizens of the silver-and-gold communities supposed to trade with the new kingdom and between themselves now? The dilemma of the current blockchain environment is remarkably similar to the circumstances presented here. Community members of each of the now-numerous blockchains can value their assets relative to itself and outside demand. But without some unifying agent, cross-chain interaction is cumbersome at best, preventing most cryptocurrencies from having a stable valuation. Where to From Here? There are two solutions to the issue of blockchain segmentation. One is similar to the tactics of the conquering king: building another “meta-chain” to which all become members. In this case, it would be similar to valuing silver and gold relative to bronze, and the villages adopting bronze as a standardized currency when transacting with different communities. Blockchains would transact amongst themselves in the “meta-coin,” with values reflective of market demand. It’s clear though that this would take a whole lot of work, and a whole lot of cooperation between blockchains, which will not be easy to achieve. The other option, though, is far less demanding. Rather than building another layer, there exists the possibility of a top service layer, which connects different blockchains by protocol rather than coin. In the case of the economically-isolated villagers, such a top layer would allow for direct exchange between silver, gold, bronze, and any other unit of value. For blockchains, this means a top-level link between one another without compromising core functionality or efficiency. In order to transact across chains, it’s necessary to introduce two significant functions; inter-chain addresses and protocols. In the first of these, unique addresses are assigned in order to uniformly identify participants of different chains, even when they’re operating on the same base framework. Then, using connector nodes (elements of the service node layer), the two blockchains can easily interact using a defined ICP (inter-chain protocol), which acts as a set of relational rules between the connected ledgers. Until blockchains begin to connect to one another with such an easily-implementable framework, it is unlikely that blockchains will reach their full potential for mass adoption. Beyond the obvious segmentation issue that discourages efficient user interaction between functions, the current layout is destructive to the goals of market-disrupting adoption. With teams building blockchains for everything from shipping to banking to sustainability, the future ability for these chains to interact with one another is fundamental for large-scale adoption of the technology.

Danke für den Link. Aus diesem geht hervor, dass der Kodakcoin bisher auf ganzer Linie gescheitert ist, die Kodakplattform nicht existent ist, bei den Verkaufszahlen gelogen wurde und dass es bisher keine Akzeptanz oder Diskussionen/Relevanz in sozialen Netzwerken oder sonstigen digitalen Medien gibt. Falls ich falsch liege, bitte korrigieren.

www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/08/27/84percent-of-companies-are-dabbling--in-blockchain-new-survey-says-.html

Es scheint wohl Probleme beim Kodakcoin zu geben die Token an den Mann zu bringen. https://www.finder.com.au/leaked-kodakcoin-document-might-show-an-incredible-trainwreck

Aber die Beteiligung an millennial esports könnte echt ein lohnendes Geschäft werden. Die bieten ihr Spiel auch für Nintendo Switch an habe ich eben bei finanznachrichten.de gelesen, falls ich es richtig verstanden habe, ist auf englisch

Armes würtschen Rossi wieder unterwegs.... Helf den Hilfsbedürftigen im Pott du Forenpenner