Lucid Group Forum: Community User: voodoo

Ja ich denk auch nicht das es an lucid liegt aber lucid reagiert direkt extrem drauf 😆

Das hat heute weniger mit Lucid zu tun. Gesamter premarket in rot🙈😅. Kann man nur hoffen das es sich später erholt

Und abwärts ohje

Gesunde Konsoldierung halt😎

Immerhin shortet hier gerade niemand so wie bei sl oder rivian.

Hoffentlich geht die Nasdaq heute nicht noch weiter runter

Ich halte sowieso generell rein gar nichts Lucid mit Tesla zu vergleichen!!!

deshalb habe ich beide

Die profis sind wieder am gross reden. Das gehype ist langweilig

...mann kann doch nicht ernsthaft das Unternehmen Musk mit LCID vergleichen- das sind doch zwei paar Schuhe und Lucid ist eine edler Nieschenplayer der seinen eigenen Markt finden muss und wird...

Danke Ernesto 🙈🤣

Danke Ernesto 🙈🤣

Ende 🤓🤣

The fact that Lucid isn’t reliant upon their own battery technology means that it is far more nimble during this time of significant battery iteration. As noted in the above section, the EV industry is likely to be driven by a series of disruptive technologies through the foreseeable future, and a company that is easily able to consistently pivot to these disruptive technologies has a better chance of staying on top of the market. To give Tesla credit, its cells are some of the best on the market. However, it’s hard to stay at the top of two different fields, car design and battery design, and the desire to do so often results in failure. The fact that Lucid walloped Tesla in drivetrain efficiency speaks to the fact that Tesla is no longer engineering the best electric vehicles and all signs point to Tesla’s battery advantage dwindling. Investor Takeaway Look, I don’t think that Tesla, or Lucid Motors for that matter, should be valued close to where they are today but the fact of the matter is that they are. If Lucid will ultimately be the stronger of the two, take that as you will. I won’t pretend that I can predict the flow of the market with companies like Tesla and Lucid, which trade so far removed from any fundamentals, but I do think that time will prove that Lucid is the better of the two companies. Ignoring share prices, Lucid Motors is gearing up for some pretty extreme growth. The company has a lot of cash on hand and is using it to invest in growing its production and product offerings. Similar to Tesla, Lucid plans to introduce mass-market vehicles after its niche offerings begin generating capital and brand awareness. As the disclosure below notes, I own shares of Lucid Motors. This may seem strange, as I just said that their fundamentals don’t come close to justifying their valuation. Though, when shares were under $20, it was far more appealing. To be completely honest, at this stage, I’m just holding to see where it goes.

All of the red space you see is wasted space. Trying to fit a bunch of cylinders in a rectangular container is always going to be inefficient. Hence, from a volumetric density perspective, the prismatic cell architecture is superior. In vehicles, where space is a premium, volumetric density is a critical performance benchmark. Though, I think that this speaks to a larger issue in Tesla’s battery cell development. In a previous article, I discussed how Tesla’s batteries are becoming a liability. The company’s unwillingness to consider lithium metal batteries as the next generation of lithium-ion batteries could see the company’s battery advantage completely erode by the end of the decade.