EUROPEAN METALS HOLDINGS Forum: Community User: maxi1981

Bin raus. Steig bei 0.30 wieder ein.

Sooooooooo, jetzt wird es laaaaaangsaaaam interessant ;)

Nee, 48 cent

Interresant für Einstieg z.zt ???

London zieht an.....

http://m.4-traders.com/EUROPEAN-METALS-HOLDINGS-16256807/news/4th-May-2017-Patersons-Research-Update-PDF-652-Kb-24321496/

Ist jetzt schon ein Schnäppchen.

Und, gut oder schlecht? ;-)

Neuer Quartals Bericht ist draussen, auf Hotcopper einzusehen.

Weiter gehts mit dem plus.

Schönes Lebenszeichen aus London.....6% plus...

Hoffen wir mal das es jetzt solide bleibt.....

kleines Licht am Horizont, der Boden scheint gefunden

Bin wieder eingestiegen

Hoffe du hast recht.....ich sehe keinen Grund für den so starken rückgang....wir werden sehen...

Email from Keith I got a fast and detailed response to my email to KC this morning: 'Thank you for your mail. I too am a little distressed by the share price reaction to the PFS. Let me explain the 2 issues you highlight – The cost of production in the PFS is higher than the scoping study for a couple of reasons. Firstly, all costs have risen dramatically across the boards. Attached is a chart that was used around the time of the scoping study showing ORE and SQM with a cost of $ 2,000/tonne. Compare that with today and SQM is showing $ 3,000 and ORE around $ 3,500. What is more important is our cost of production relative to the others. At this level we will be the lowest cost hard rock producer and comparable with the brines. That is certainly significant. Secondly, and relevant to your tin comment – the scoping study was based on mining the Cinovec South part of the deposit. That was because of the then relative metal prices – tin @ 22,500 and LCE @ 6,500. The South has not been mined of tin at all, so more tin and therefore a higher contribution to the bottom line. When the decision was made re the PFS, tin was 14,000 and LCE 8,500 and heading up. It was therefore decided to base the PFS on the higher grade, shallower lithium zones in Cinovec Main (the north). The tin has been mined here so less tin credit and lower contribution to the bottom line. The positive is we produce more lithium per tonne of rock mined…. Trade off. We didn’t set out at the beginning of the PFS to limit the study to a percentage of the resource That's not the way it works. You set parameters on mining and production target based upon what seems reasonable at that time which ultimately translates into a percentage of your resource. Don't forget we had 2 significant resource upgrades during the PFS. We will do an expansion study as part of the next phase which will indicate the economics of a greater production target, Certainly it would seem that the market will take a lot more end product! I am planning on another Proactive Investor session next week to clarify these issues.'