FREYR BATTERY Forum: Community User: Mountainclimber

.... ich kann ja mal reposten was du so alles gesagt hast.... da dreht sich mein Magen um

….., und 1,91 € sind immer noch 90% mehr als vor einem Jahr!

Einfach mal den Jahreschart anschauen und wirken lassen......

Zinseszins: 1.91 € nach 4 Wochen!

Also noch 4 Wochen und wir sind bei -5€ 🤣

Was hatte ich noch mal gesagt, jeden Tag des Schweigens (Fuzzy Panda) bedeutet für t1 4-5 % im Minus! Ist doch klar „uncertainty feeds the baisse ”!

Nie gut, wenn Ideologie anstatt Verstand regiert 🤢 American solar manufacturers are betting on the states. States need to match that bet. - pv magazine USA https://share.google/qIfsyG19kVROoVslH Die Solarbranche warnt vor Verzögerungen bei den Genehmigungsverfahren und droht mit Kosten von 120 Milliarden US-Dollar für die Verbraucher – PV Magazine USA https://share.google/Ej3QYdvam5uQNBECP Die anhaltenden wirtschaftlichen Folgen des OBBBA - pv magazine USA https://share.google/Ewu9eQ9yErarLhqDV

Diese neuerliche Attacke ist jetzt schon einige Tage her - irgendwie würde ein Statement von T1 mal nicht schaden würde ich mal sagen.....

etc. etc. etc. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1992243/000199224326000007/t1-20251231.htm?

On December 29, 2025, the Company, G1_Dallas, TUS, Trina Solar Energy Development PTE. Ltd., Trina Solar (Viet Nam) Wafer Company Limited and TCZ, entered into a letter agreement (the “Non-IP Commercial Agreements Letter Agreement”), pursuant to which, the parties amended the terms of certain agreements by and among the Company, G1_Dallas, TUS and other affiliates of Trina, including, among others, the Module Operational Support Agreement and the Sales Agency Agreement (collectively, the “Commercial Agreements”). As a result of the FEOC Restructuring, the Trademark License Agreement with Trina was terminated and Trina no longer provides product warranties for PV solar modules sold by the Company unless branded with the Trina trademark. The Company expects to establish a new warranty framework for T1-branded PV solar modules under which the Company will provide warranty directly, supported by third-party warranty insurance. The Company expects this warranty framework to be in place during the second quarter of 2026. All sales of T1-branded PV solar modules are not expected to be subject to the commission described above under the Sales Agency Agreement to the extent that such commission is applied to the Covered Products.

Trina (TCZ) verkaufte und übertrug sämtliche Rechte am lizenzierten geistigen Eigentum an Evervolt. Research & Development and Technology On December 23, 2024, we signed an IP license agreement (the “IP License Agreement”) with Trina Solar Co., Ltd., a company incorporated in China (“TCZ”). Pursuant to the IP License Agreement, we received a non-exclusive license under the Licensed IP (as defined in the IP License Agreement) to: 1.manufacture certain PV solar modules and solar cells at G1_Dallas or another approved facility owned by us or certain of our subsidiaries, including our subsidiary T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module LLC (f/k/a T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC and Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC (“G1”)); 2.distribute and sell such PV solar modules and cells in the United States; and 3.operate our approved solar module and solar cell manufacturing facilities. On December 29, 2025, TCZ informed the Company that it sold and assigned all of its right, title and interest in the Licensed IP to Evervolt Green Energy Holding Pte Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Singapore (“Evervolt”, and such sale, the “IP Sale”). On December 29, 2025, the Company, G1, TCZ and Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TUS”), entered into a letter agreement (the “IP Letter Agreement”), pursuant to which, the parties agreed that (i) the amended and restated trademark license agreement, dated December 23, 2024, by and between G1, as licensee and TUS, as licensor (the “Trademark License Agreement”) was terminated effective immediately, with no liability by any party, whether accrued, contingent or otherwise, (ii) the IP License Agreement would be assigned to Evervolt and Evervolt would replace TCZ as the licensor thereunder (the “IP Assignment”), (iii) Evervolt and the Company would enter into an Amended IP License Agreement (as defined below) and (iv) upon the completion of the 2025 Royalty Payment (as defined in the IP Letter Agreement), the Company, G1 and their respective affiliates would not have liability or other obligation to TCZ or its affiliates in connection with the Trademark License Agreement or the Existing IP License Agreements (as defined in the IP Letter Agreement) for fiscal year 2025. In connection with the IP Assignment, Evervolt and the Company entered into an amendment to the IP License Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2025 (the “First Amendment to the IP License Agreement” and the IP License Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment to the IP License Agreement, the “Amended IP License Agreement”). The Amended IP License Agreement remains substantially on the same terms as the IP License Agreement, except for certain amendments, including, among other things: (i) the exclusion of intellectual property owned by an SFE from the scope of Licensed IP and similar amendments to address compliance with the OBBBA, (ii) updates to definitions and conforming changes to reflect the IP Sale and IP Assignment, (iii) restriction on the ability of Evervolt and its affiliates to sell, convey, assign or otherwise transfer any Licensed IP to an SFE; (iv) amendments to the termination provision to remove certain termination rights and (v) certain amendments to terminate the Exclusivity Arrangement and to the royalty mechanics and administrative provisions.

EVERVOLT GREEN ENERGY HOLDING PTE. LTD. | Suche im Handelsregister https://share.google/3JYc4e6UUzhzEe4ZS

Stimmt, du hast recht. Die Vorwürfe im Juni waren Teil 2 und 3.

Ich meine aus Sicht des Unternehmen, reden ist Silber, schweigen ist Gold. Wenn die was sagen, könnte genau dann sich wieder etwas ergeben, was zu diesen weiteren Berichten führen könnte. Roth C. und Bernstein haben ja diese Anschuldigungen damals geprüft und glaube sogar nachgekauft. Für mich stellt sich das mit diesem Unternehmen Evervold oder wie das heißt, was die Trina-Patente da hat so dar, als wenn die als Gegenseite ein rechtliches Schlupfloch suchen um Kasse zu machen. Und wenn die Sec und Analysten dann sagen, das T1 Managment handelt in seinem rechtlich Möglichen, gehts schnell wieder nach oben. Gefahr besteht meiner Meinung halt nur, das irgendwo was übersehen wurde oder wissentlich ignoriert wurde, was Schaden machen könnte. Wenn ich was übersehe, klärt mich gern auf!

Meines Wissens kamen bisher 2 Teile und ich meine auch, es war von 5 die Rede. Was die wohl noch alles (vermeintlich) aufdecken wollen?

Hatten sie nicht 5 Berichte, 3 haben er weg, die werden sicher noch mal aus der Deckung kommen