SAP WKN: 716460 ISIN: DE0007164600 Kürzel: SAP Forum: Aktien Thema: Hauptdiskussion

Bank of America skeptisch über Semi's. Mit Ausnahme von NVIDIA sind viele Chipaktien in den USA gefallen. Handelt es sich nun um eine Rotation hin zu Software?

Ein guter Zeitpunkt, um einen Krieg zu beginnen.

Diese Woche markiert den Anfang vom Ende für Trump: Die Handelsbilanz verschlechterte sich, die Inflation stieg, das Wachstum verlangsamte sich, und nun das.

Tariffs Trump rejected

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s tariffs. Here’s what the president could try to use instead. By Robert Schroeder and Victor Reklaitis Published: Feb. 20, 2026 at 10:05 a.m. ET 'The U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a blow to President Donald Trump’s economic agenda, saying he exceeded his authority in using a 1977 law to justify a large swath of his tariffs. Yet the Supreme Court’s decision does not mean that Trump is now entirely unable to slap tariffs on other countries’ products. The president, for example, has at his disposal Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the same tool he used to impose import taxes on steel, aluminum, lumber and furniture, and his sector-based tariffs were not getting addressed in the Supreme Court case. There is also Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, used during Trump’s first term to put tariffs on Chinese goods. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the Trump administration is ready to maintain its levies through those other avenues. The ruling by the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has come after lower courts found that Trump exceeded his authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to justify his many country-specific tariffs. The court heard oral arguments in the case on Nov. 5, and the likelihood of a ruling in Trump’s favor dropped at that time, as some conservative justices’ questions for the president’s attorney were perceived to be especially skeptical. Opponents of the IEEPA tariffs have emphasized that the law doesn’t explicitly mention tariffs in its text and say that no president has ever used IEEPA to impose tariffs. Trump has vehemently defended his tariffs and claimed that the U.S. economy would be “immeasurably hurt” if the Supreme Court struck them down. He argued during a “60 Minutes” interview that aired in November that the tariffs helped push stocks to record highs and that the U.S. economy “will go to hell” if they are rejected by the court. The Supreme Court’s rejection of the IEEPA tariffs may now trigger a complicated process of refunding the billions of dollars paid to the U.S. government. The rejection of the IEEPA tariffs, plus Trump’s expected use of other tariff powers, could cause “a lot of uncertainty” and amount to a negative for the economy, according to a top Federal Reserve official.'

SAP wird in Deutschland nicht ausreichend gewürdigt.

Zusammengeklebt, bis die Raketentriebwerke die Bindung lösen.

Wie festgetackert!

Zumindestens haben schon mal die 170 € gehalten. Das ist das einzig Positive zur Zeit?

Ich finde den heutigen Tag sehr stark, in Anbetracht der Umstände und des Gessamtmarktes. Der Bereich um 170 herum ist eine ganz starke Unterstützung, mehrfach gesehen. Eigentlich Traum fürs Trading.

Denkst du auch mal irgendwas was du nicht sofort hier reinschreibst?

Die Nachfrage und Begeisterung, hält sich momentan stark in Grenzen? 👹

Weil ich erst kürzlich gekauft habe. Verstanden du Intelligenz Bolzen?

Geduld

Bring es uns bei den Tiefpunkt bei Aktien zu kaufen, Senpai. Wenn man danach ginge bist du wohl der beste Investor aller Zeiten, gratuliere

Wie kann man bei dieser Aktie im Minus sein? Die ist die letzten paar Jahre doch nur gestiegen und hat ein kgv inkl. Goodwill von ca. 30.