CureVac - Hauptforum Forum: Community User: NeulingImDAX

To produce eight billion doses of the CureVac Covid-19 mRNA vaccine within six months, seven production lines and 1,295 batches would be required, as shown in Table 3 below. These seven production lines can be placed into two facilities; one of these facilities would have three production lines and the other facility would contain four production lines. The total capital cost required to construct, equip, validate, and start up the two facilities with three or four production lines per facility for producing eight billion CVnCoV vaccine doses is estimated at $405.6 million.

Ruudi. Luciman.Annchen. Suggest this will help and I will post the full report later- as this on its own if CVAC comes through will blow Pfizer and Moderna away. (CureVac’s doses might also turn out to be cheaper than the others. Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy organization, released a report Wednesday from researchers at Imperial College London, estimating the costs of producing enough RNA vaccines to provide herd immunity in low- and middle-income countries. Researchers found that iIt would cost $23 billion to make 8 billion doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, $9 billion for Moderna and just $4 billion for CureVac. Last year, the company’s vaccine had promising results when used on animals. By December they had launched their final clinical trial, recruiting 40,000 volunteers in 10 countries in Latin America and Europe. On Wednesday, CureVac indicated that further information about its vaccine trial would arrive by the end of June.)

AS posted earlier- the warning signs are now in place- as if Vietnam with its strict policy of isolation-track trace is seeing a new variant- you can be assured the EU and USA-Israel are light years behind https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/vietnam-detects-hybrid-of-covid-19-variant-identified-in-india-and-uk

Wie gesagt war nur ganz grob über den Daumen... Wollte damit nur sagen ich denke die 111 und mehr haben wir erreicht unter den 40k Probanden...

I have viewed the stocktwits link- in all honesty I do not understand it and how the person dervies a figure. Also I have an issue here with Curvac data of last night- for me its been put out in haste to cover the fact that Curevac spokewoman spoke out of turn and it left Curevac with a headache . The media group who published the report on Thursday had to many contradictions in it. Curevac are new as far as company listed on the NSADAQ and they certainly need to learn the listing regulations and relaize they are no longer a private company. It does also beg this question from me- The CEO needs to take a tighter grip and Curvac needs Ingmar on board doing what he dose best and that is leading and explaining everything from the front. I am not negative on what Curevac are doing in the trials- but certainly Curevac need a tighter grip in some areass. Other point- if you read any of the Argentine press- they give the impression from people vaccinated in the trial - that they want the all signing all dancing Curevac vaccine now..

Fälle nach ländern gibt es hier... Zb https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1090985/umfrage/fallzahl-des-coronavirus-2019-ncov-nach-laendern/

Nein Rudi, kein Fehler das ist mir bewusst... Dennoch denke ich dass 0,5-1% in dem zeitraum sicher realustisch sind.... Auch da ein grossteil der studie on südamerika stattgefunden hat wo wir zb in brasilien über 8% liegen.... Und sollten in den 40.000 keine 111 Erkrankungen erzielt werden wäre das ja äußerst dämlich von curevac gewesen wenn man weiß dass man das erfüllen muss und man auch weiß dass man da zumindestens 0,3 bis 0,4% der Probanden braucht, die sich infizieren müssen damit die studie erfüllt ust

https://guggenheimsecurities.bluematrix.com/sellside/EmailDocViewer?mime=pdf&co=guggenheim&id=CRISPR_made_Covid19@bluematrix.com&source=mail&encrypt=31f6101e-a64a-4390-ab34-685537b12123

@Ruudi Longie um 13:00Uhr ist lesewert aber nicht ganz richtig.

@jonathan and @ruuudi you have to use the link at stocktwits: https://stocktwits.com/I_Hate_Thou/message/336819563 There you can open the report

@Toi Ich weiß nicht, was du meinst.

@jense Denkfehler: Zu deinen 4% (stimmt das auch?). Wie du schreibst „bis heute“. Die Studie Phase 2b/läuft aber seit 14.12. - das sind knapp 5 Monate. Die Steigerung der Infektionen ist zwar exponentiell und zudem in der Rekrutierungsphase. Aber die 40.000 sind erst Mitte April vollständig an Bord. Die GesamtBevölkerung musste nicht rekrutiert werden, war und ist nicht hälftig geimpft und der Zeitraum „bis heute“ ist zudem 3x so lang. Also mehrfacher Fehler in deiner Abschätzung.

I have had the details through from a NHS employee on the deaths in the UK from the Indian Variant. One Hospital region as had 15 deaths - 4 of them were fully inocculated with Vaccines. 3 of the deaths had Pfizer and the had the second dose 2 months ago- the other death is Astra where the person had only had one dose. The age of the 3 that had pfizer were between 55 and 65 . Now for me that equates to Pfizer having a efficacy rate of 7O% maximum. Now we should get more information later next week

@Ruudi Longie 13:00 UhrPunkt 4 ist keine Hinderung zur Entbindung, da Ännchen 18:35 dies anderes berichtet hat.